摘要
中华民族文化是构建民族文化心理场域的文化基因。民族文化心理场域塑造中华民族共同体的认同。中华民族文化认同与民族文化心理场域之间存在着内在联系。在现代化的背景下，民族文化心理场域边界的流动性和民族文化价值的多元性使得民族文化心理场域的生成和构建面临多元认同困境，不利于中华民族共同体的培育。本文基于文化共同体重构了民族文化共生心理场域，基于认同共同体重构了民族文化认同心理场域，并以民族共同体为目标重构了民族文化认同心理场域，从而有助于中华民族共同体多元认同的形成。
关键词： 民族文化；多元认同；民族共同体；文化心理场域
Abstract
The Chinese national culture is the cultural gene that constructs the national cultural psychological field. The national cultural psychological field shapes the identity of the Chinese national community. There is an inherent connection between Chinese national cultural identity and national cultural psychological field. In the context of modernization. The fluidity of the boundaries of the national cultural psychological field and the plurality of national cultural values make the generation and construction of the national cultural psychological field face a plural identity dilemma, which is not conducive to the cultivation of the Chinese national community. This paper reconstructs the psychological field of ethnic cultural symbiosis on the basis of cultural community, reconstructs the psychological field of ethnic cultural identity on the basis of identity community, and reconstructs the psychological field of ethnic cultural identity with the goal of ethnic community, which helps the formation of the pluralistic identity of the Chinese ethnic community.
Key words： National culture; Multiple identities; National community; Cultural psychological field
参考文献 References
[1] Sun Jieyuan. (2017). On Education for Ethnic Cultural Psychological Field Shaping. Educational Research, (11), 33-40.
[2] Sun Jieyuan. (2013). Cultural genes and educational fields of national identity of ethnic minority students. Educational Research, (12), 91-96.
[3] Richard Dawkins. (2018). The selfish gene. Beijing: CITIC Press.
[4] Fan, Yu-Mei. (1983). Festivals of ethnic minorities in China. Social Science Front, (03), 211-219.
[5] Zhang Dai-nian, Cheng Yishan. (2015). The spirit of Chinese culture. Beijing: Peking University Press.
[6] Sun Jieyuan. (2016). On Ethnic Cultural Psychological Field and Its Educational Implications. Educational Research, (12), 4-11+21.
[7] Jürgen Habermas. (2002). Post-ethnic structure (p.178). Shanghai People's Press.
[8] Lee Hong. (2020). Passing on the cultural genes of the Chinese national community. Journal of Dalian University for Nationalities, (04), 289-293.
[9] Alfred Grosé. (2010). The dilemma of identity. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press.
[10] Sun Jieyuan. (2019). Individual, culture, education and national identity: A study on national identity and cultural integration of ethnic minority students (pp.59-85). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[11] Jia, Yingjian. (2006). The Philosophical Implications of Identity and the Nature of Value Identity. Journal of Shandong Normal Univer-sity (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), (01), 10-16.